![]() |
|
![]() |
| Home | Publications | Contacts |
High-res. surveys |
Turbulence |
Moorings & NDBC |
Aircraft |
Coastal radar |
Atmospheric modeling |
Satellite data |
Data assimilation |
Fall AGU Meeting (Dec. 2002) COAST abstracts:COAST overview (Barth)
Abstracts should be cited as:
|
OS62A-0241 Comparison of Hydrostatic and Nonhydrostatic Models in the Coastal Ocean S Durski and J S Allen Models employing the hydrostatic approximation have long been the standard for numerical simulations of the coastal ocean. As computational performance has improved and our understanding of ocean physics developed, these models have been pushed to higher resolution to uncover the role smaller scale phenomena play on the mesoscale circulation. However as the vertical and horizontal length scales of the processes of interest converge nonhydrostatic effects which are neglected by these models become of first-order importance. The dynamics at these scales can involve energetic mixing which may significantly feedback into the larger scale circulation. Examples include the breaking of internal waves and enhanced mixing over small- scale topography. In this study we compare the performance of a hydrostatic model to that of a non-hydrostatic model in two-dimensional coastal ocean settings. The hydrostatic model to be employed is ROMS. The non-hydrostatic model is a version of Clark's cloud-scale meteorological model which has been adapted for oceanic application. Both models are formulated in generalized sigma-coordinates which make them favorable for simulating flow over continental shelf topography. The two models are configured with identical spatial resolutions to accommodate direct comparisons. The generation and propagation of internal waves are compared in simulations of wind and tidally forced stratified flow over topography including a case representative of the circulation at Stonewall Bank off the Oregon coast. Shoreward propagation of large amplitude internal waves established by an imposed displacement of the pycnocline at model initialization is also explored. The comparisons reveal both areas of parameter space where the solutions are comparable and ones where they differ significantly. The most apparent difference in these experiments rests in the inability of the hydrostatic model to represent the balance between non-linear and dispersive effects that arise in internal solitary waves. |